Blog

Raise the Disability Vote for Affordable Housing in Baltimore!

A referendum on whether Baltimore City should create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund will be on the November 8th ballot! This summer, a coalition of advocacy organizations came together as Housing for All and gathered more than 18,000 petition signatures demanding that a referendum on a Charter Amendment be added to the November 2016 Election Ballot.

The Affordable Housing Trust Fund would require Baltimore City to create a fund into which vacant land, existing housing, and abandoned properties would be turned into affordable housing and made available to city residents making 50% or less than the Area Median Income. A housing trust fund is legal entity used to create and sustain affordable housing for those most in need. It is established by local or state government and receives ongoing public funding to support the preservation and production of affordable housing. Over 750 cities, counties, and states have Housing Trust Funds. Baltimore should have an Affordable Housing Trust Fund!

All around the country, but especially in Maryland, people with disabilities have worst case housing needs and are much more likely to need affordable housing than others in our community. Many people with disabilities survive on SSI-level income, which is below the federal poverty limit and about 18% of Area Median Income for the Baltimore Area. The referendum is just a first step – the Affordable Housing Trust Fund would only be created, not funded at this stage – but this model has been used successfully around the country and could be a good way of producing and maintaining affordable housing for those who need it most. For the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to become a reality, it is essential that Baltimore City residents with disabilities vote on November 8th!

Read more

Joint Statement on the Justice Department’s Investigation of Baltimore City Police

The National Disability Rights Network (NDRN) and its member organization, Disability Rights Maryland (DRM), are pleased to see the treatment of individuals with disabilities by law enforcement officers included throughout the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division’s (CRD) recent investigation into the conduct of the Baltimore City Police Department (BPD). NDRN and DRM support the CRD’s efforts to ensure that government agencies act in a manner that protects the rights of community members with disabilities, and complies with the rule of law. Through their work representing individuals with disabilities, the nationwide network of Protection and Advocacy (P&A) agencies often learn of cases involving negative and sometimes extremely dangerous interactions between people with disabilities and police. These interactions often include individuals with mental health disabilities, as well as individuals with sensory, intellectual, developmental and other types of disabilities; and disproportionately affect additional specific communities, particularly people of color.

The CRD report calls for improvement in the following key areas:

  • The failure of the BPD to provide basic reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities.
  • The failure of the BPD to use common de-escalation techniques on individuals in crisis, resulting in the use of excessive force (e.g. “drive stun mode”), arrest, unnecessary hospitalization, and/or death.
  • Deficient training, oversight, and policies to protect individuals with the types of disabilities that officers are likely to encounter in their day-to-day work.
  • Lack of collaboration with community partners who may assist BPD in serving individuals with disabilities, thereby avoiding or limiting the need for police intervention.

Negative interactions with police have long been a concern of NDRN and the P&A Network. We hope that the independent voices of individuals with disabilities will be heard clearly, and their needs will stay at the forefront throughout the implementation of the report’s recommendations.
See the full report at: https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/883366/download

# # #

The National Disability Rights Network (NDRN) is the nonprofit membership organization for the federally mandated Protection and Advocacy (P&A) Systems and the Client Assistance Programs (CAP) for individuals with disabilities. Collectively, the Network is the largest provider of legally based advocacy services to people with disabilities in the United States.

Disability Rights Maryland (formerly Maryland Disability Law Center), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, is the federally mandated Protection & Advocacy organization charged with advancing and defending the rights of Marylanders with all types of disabilities, of all ages, statewide.

Press Release – DOJ BPD report

 

Read more

DRM Investigates, Finds Abuse of Students with Autism

DRM successfully resolved the cases of nine students with autism who faced abuse and segregation in Harford County Public Schools. DRM was alerted to a situation in Harford County in 2014 involving a segregated classroom of young students with autism who had reportedly been sprayed in the face with water, threatened with a rolling pin and subjected to other abusive treatment by their teacher and classroom assistants. We spent the next several months conducting an extensive investigation that substantiated these allegations and revealed other harms. Our resulting report, authored by Managing Attorney Leslie Seid Margolis, details the abuse, educational neglect, and systemic breakdowns that occurred at every level, and makes a series of recommendations addressing accountability, student safety, relief for individual students, professional development and training, other staffing issues, communication with parents, program review, Child Protective Services and more. DRM also represented nine of the children in their individual education cases to obtain appropriate assessments, individualized education programs (IEPs), greater inclusion and compensatory services for the students. Our last individual case closed in June 2016; all nine students DRM represented are placed appropriately and doing well. We have continued to monitor Harford County Public Schools’ implementation of our report recommendations, received the final status report in July 2016 and formally closed our investigation in August. Pursuant to DRM’s investigation, Harford County contracted with a consultant to improve its autism program and provided significant professional development to its staff, including an “autism summit” each summer.  The school system has also addressed many of the systemic issues that had allowed this unfortunate situation to occur. After consulting with our clients, DRM decided to release portions of our report – (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) to ensure school system accountability. See media reports of the investigation below:

“Harford special education program under scrutiny” The Baltimore Sun

“Harford teachers union calls for wider training amind allegations of abuse of autistic students” The Baltimore Sun

“Law center finds ‘systematic breakdown’ at fault for abuse of autistic students” CBS Washington 

“Report raises concern over treatment of students with special needs” WBAL TV

Read more

Dara

DRM represented “Dara,” a young woman with mental illness who lives in a supportive housing program. The program terminated Dara’s lease after she intervened in a fight to protect a friend who was being assaulted in her building. DRM investigated and found that the building, which serves young adults who are formerly homeless or aging out of foster care, was very chaotic because the program had stopped providing building security, and Dara’s case manager was refusing to intervene when she asked for help or indicated she did not feel safe. DRM was able to negotiate a solution whereby the supportive housing program allowed Dara to move to an independent apartment of her choosing with continued rental assistance. DRM also advocated for the program to train its staff about the principles of trauma informed care.

Read more

Public Policy

DRM provides education and technical assistance in public policy matters affecting people with disabilities. DRM engages in a limited amount of policy advocacy within the legal restrictions established for nonprofit organizations.

2017 General Assembly Session

2016 General Assembly Session

Read more